Tuesday, September 27, 2016

SEP 27, 2016 LENR MOTIVATION-DOMINATION DOES NOT GO!

MOTTO

Image result for domination quotationImage result for domination quotations gorbachev

True in LENR too.              We have to stop the rise of Arturo Ui-s!


APPEAL TO THE PARTICIPANTS AT ICCF20 AND SSICCF20

My dear known and unknown Friends!

Please help me and my readers by sending me your papers, posters, presentations, slides, videos- whatever- so that I can publish them here in the very day they are presented at Xiamen or Sendai.
An anticipated great Thank you!

Peter

DAILY NOTES

On the LENR Forum in the known threads I continued to discuss with my opponents and nothing changes- their real motivation is domination- everybody must think what they think. Facts and logic ignored by them.
This is the tactic, they claim repeatedly, with increasing vigor:

Nothing is what it seems, so you are not able to see the truth. However I will explain it to you and you MUST believe me!

Good as tactic, but on long term- strategy not,  they will learn that if in mechanics reaction is equal with action, in psychology the reaction can be much greater than action. Without my fight even they will see how the resistance of independently thinking skilled people will sweep them away. See the first Motto.

What motivates Abd ul Rahman Lomax in LENR

 for myself, I am motivated by several things.

1. When I see someone who has earned respect through years of hard work being attacked because he disagrees with Peter Gluck, I may defend him. I have previously posted a link to DefendEachOther, a long-standing internet concept; in this, it is not our responsibility to defend ourselves, and it is often counterproductive to do so. It is our responsibility to defend others. I defended Rossi against intemperate attack from Steve Krivit, and I don't regret that at all. It was noise, distracting from the real situation. What critics like Krivit and Mary Yugo point out is often obvious, but reality is more complex than the models they are attached to. Criminals, as an example, can be more trustworthy than ordinary people, sometimes. I've been a prison chaplain, I'll testify to this.

2. CMNS is a scientific field and requires a scientific approach. Science approaches "fact" with caution. Law is actually similar, but law is perhaps more socially developed. Science is also social. When I have knowledge that is uncommon, I consider I have some obligation to share it. Right now, I have uncommon knowledge about Rossi v. Darden, because I have studied those documents over and over to write about them. I have uncommon knowledge of the history of cold fusion (not unique knowledge and Jed Rothwell and Peter Gluck have been around a lot longer than I have, in the field as to being active. Nevertheless, I came in and approached the field with some new perspectives, and so I saw things that had sometimes been missed. I write about them.)

3. Because it's there. Because I am involved with LENR. I see things and write about them. To an extent, this is an addiction. As an addiction, I may engage in it out of balance. Hence this is all a topic of discussion with counselors and therapists, friends and family.

4. I want to see Peter happy for the rest of his life, and the way he writes, he's not happy. He is far too attached to conditions that he cannot control. For some years before Rossi v. Darden, it was obvious that Peter had identified "LENR+" -- which can only refer to Rossi's work because Peter's idea was this was "stronger" -- as the hope that he might see successful LENR before he dies. Peter is only a little older than I. I'm not worried. What I see is that I have already been successful, and LENR is on its way. How far it will get before I die does not matter so much to me. I have already reached goals that are satisfying. There may be more -- maybe even much more -- but it's not a necessity for me.

5. If I become peevish and start doing what Peter started to do, I sincerely hope that my friends will warn and restrain me. So I am doing for Peter what I would want my friends to do for me, hoping he will recognize what is being said to him.


Long, with many mixed elements

It was a longer discussion and my conclusion is that it is impossible to discuss with people using invented stories, diagrams and other facts, who have completely different standards of truth and a different sense of reality and values than myself, - so I broke the diplomatic relations with my two opponents. My compassion to IH for using such ineffective propagandists.

DAILY NEWS

1a) Good prospects for Leonardo Corp./Andrea Rossi lawsuit vs. Cherokee Investment Partners/Thomas Darden 
Update Sep 27, 2016

1b) In October there will be a hearing on that paper before Judge Altonaga:
https://thenewfire.wordpress.com/good-prospects-for-rossi-and-leonardo-corp-lawsuit/


2) REALLY INTERESTING THINGS DESCRIBED AT THE MFMOP SITE!
ps://www.facebook.com/MartinFleischmannMemorialProject/posts/127648497571553

1a) MFMP: LENR LIVE proposal 1: The neutron sparkler


2b) MFMP Publishes New Video and Slideshow: Doppelgänger — Does a 2006 Patent Describe the ‘Rossi Effect’?
http://www.e-catworld.com/2016/09/26/mfmp-prepares-for-an-announcement/


2c) Fleischmann Project Makes an Intriguing Statement
http://coldfusion3.com/blog/fleischmann-project-makes-an-intriguing-statement
3) From Andrea Rossi's JONP

H
September 26, 2016 at 8:03 PM

Dr Andrea Rossi,
Are you oriented to define LENR your technology, or you think it belongs to other fields?
Thank you
Andrea Rossi
September 27, 2016 at 12:05 AM

H:
We belong to te LENR field.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Rino
September 26, 2016 at 12:05 PM

Mr Andrea Rossi,
Can you explain which has been the inspiration that made you arrive to the present results?
Cheers,
Rino
Andrea Rossi
September 26, 2016 at 7:09 PM

Rino:
The spark has been started from the first announcement of F&P. Eventually, after I reaized that the electrolysis was conducting nowhere, the idea to use nickel as a catalyzer of compounds with hydrogen came from the enormous work, and experience, I made with Ni as a chemical catalyzer in hydrogenation processes when I made experiments for my thermolytic plants from 1976 to 1994. Obviously the matter was totally different, but ideas and intuitions make tunnels between arguments apparently strange to each other.
Warm Regards,
A.R.




LENR IN CONTEXT-1

Lowering the heat makes new materials possible while saving energy
Date:September 26, 2016
Source:Penn State Materials Research Institute
Summary:
A low-temperature process has been developed that has opened a window on the ability to combine incompatible materials, such as ceramics and plastics, into new, useful compound materials.

Measuring Scientific Impact Beyond Citation Counts
http://www.dlib.org/dlib/september16/patton/09patton.html
Soon Scientometrics will be necessary for LENR too


LENR IN CONTEXT-2 

Without tenure, professors become terrified sheep

Monday, September 26, 2016

SEP 26, 2016 LENR- ABOUT MOTIVATION (I)


MOTTO

Image result for "inner motivation" quotes


DAILY NOTES

Starting a discussion or a monologue about motivation


The string of LENR Forum: "Peter Gluck, Blogger-Advocate for Rossi"- was renamed by the nice Moderator at my request- the word Technology being added to it.
It has  some 9 pages of teachings for me with many adjectives used by my opponents. The wisdom of Abd is at its best here. Today I published here the following challenge:

"As a continuation of the editorial of before of yesterday about Orwellian features in the behavior and language of my opponents, today I want answer to some wrtings of Abd, mainly in this thread. Pedagogical ones most, he wants to taech me the truthT
But first- the name of this thread is based on verbal dishonesty- the most important word was removed from it tendentiously:
It could be "Peter Gluck- blogger supporter of Rossi Technology"
I do not remember making apologetics or contributing to a cult of personality of Andrea Rossi. I just refused to participate in his systematic demonization which has descended to extreme forms as Rossi tearing out instruments from the Plant.Conspiring to the use of only the half of the pipes in the plant (lower or upper half?) ( see the Orwellian editorial till now ignored)

In the Leonardo-IH conflict I want now to compare the essence - my motivation with the motivation of my motivation.

MY MOTIVATION

My approach to LENR is that of a technologist and of a problem solver. The Rossi party claims the plant has worked well, multiplicative excess heat, ERV reports are correct real description of the situation, their history chronology has logical consistence and a good technical background.
IH's approach is the opposite, anachronistic, with proofs that I find as weak and unconvincing.
Therefore I am motivated to see thee trial as showing the Technology works, the LENR problem IS solve already.
I care for LENR.
If I say i want to see the verdict because I am both curious and motivated, Abd will use an other verbal trick saying I am obsessed but I am not. I am rational, I have my opinion and this does not make me disruptive.

What motivates you, Abd and Jed in this affair?
They know what their motivations, priorities and desire are.


Obviously Jed and Abd are engaged in many disputes, the resistance against them is increasing- they were even called trolls that do not respond to logic,,(not by meI think they have a substitute of logic)- so they couldn't answer but they can explain to their fans what drives their actions, evaluations and predictions
What I fear is that they have already totally lost their inner motivation- care for LENR, Jed owned it in a peculiar form- and now they are externally motivated by IH and- what is worse their metamorphosis described here:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/06/june-29-2016-in-lenr-you-cannot-learn.html
is not more reversible. But we will see...
DAILY NEWS



1) Rossi vs. Darden, new document at the Court pacermonitor:


Friday, September 23, 2016
54 motion Strike More Definite Statement Fri 3:30 PM 
MOTION to Strike50 Answer to Complaint, Third Party Complaint, Counterclaim,,,,,,,,, in Part Second Amended Answer, Affirmative Defenses, Counterclaims, and Third Party Claims, or in the Alternative, , MOTION for More Definite Statement by Leonardo Corporation, Andrea Rossi. Responses due by 10/11/2016(Annesser, John)

2) From Andrea Rossi's JONP

Sam Talbert
September 26, 2016 at 5:56 AM

Dr Andrea Rossi,
Based on your information, what do you think will be the most interesting presentation at the next ICCF?
Thank you if you can answer,


Sam
Andrea Rossi
September 26, 2016 at 6:40 AM

Sam Talbert:
I think the new paper of Prof. Norman Cook is important. His papers are always worth to be studied.
Warm Regards,
A.R.



T.
September 25, 2016 at 8:55 PM

Dr Andrea Rossi:
We can see that more and more institutional scientific entities are funding R&D in the LENR field, much more than before your work has been known.
I think this can be considered also an achievement of yours.
T.
Translate


Andrea Rossi
September 26, 2016 at 6:42 AM

T.:
Thank you. It is true.
Warm Regards,
A.R.

3) Eventually a first reaction to Steven Krivit's new LENR book, in Italian:
25 SETTEMBRE 2016n
Hacking the Atom


4) Cold Fusion- the first signs of a mediatic thawing
Fusione fredda | LENR: prime tracce di disgelo mediatico?
http://sdoppiamocupido.blogspot.ro/2016/09/fusione-fredda-lenr-prime-tracce-di-disgelo-mediatico.html


LENR IN CONTEXT-1


Strange?
Science Finally Confirms That People Absorb Energy From Others

Sunday, September 25, 2016

SEP 25, 2016 DEAR ETHAN, LENR IS A SCIENTIFIC PECHVOGEL!

MOTTO


COLD FUSION IS MUCH TOO COMPLEX, DIFFICULT AND DIVERSIFIED TO BE LET TO THE PHYSICISTS ALONE (Peter Gluck) 


  • Image result for :bad luck" quotesImage result for :bad luck" quotes
    • Good Advice
    • True wisdom knows
      it must comprise
      some nonsense
      as a compromise,
      lest fools should fail
      to find it wise. (Piet Hein) 


To make it clear the second image Motto is NOT for Ethan Siegel

DAILY NOTES


Actually this is a message to physicist Ethan Siegel following the paper committed recently by him:

Dear Ethan,

Introduction

I am your faithful reader, I like almost anything you are publishing in the Science Blogs, I admire 
a) your knowledge in physics, 
b) your logic,and 
c) your connection to the universal culture- the context of your writings.

In contrast with these is my following reaction to your recent paper re Cold Fusion/LENR:

Is Cold Fusion Feasible? Or Is It A Fraud?http://scienceblogs.com/startswithabang/2016/09/23/is-cold-fusion-feasible-or-is-it-a-fraud-synopsis/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+ScienceblogsPhysicalScience+%28ScienceBlogs+Channel+%3A+Physical+Science%29

It was published also in Forbes and it generates lots of echo-papers and citations given you are an authority in Physics and your words have weight and impact. However  being an authority means also having a serious responsibility and therefore I am writing now this letter to you.

The history of our dispute re LENR Cold fusion.

See please this blog issue dedicated to your former Cold Fusion paper from 2014:

[1]ETHAN SIEGEL’S THIRD BOMB THROWN ON COLD FUSION

http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2014/10/ethan-siegels-third-bomb-thrown-on-cold.html

You can find other consideration re your ideas regarding Cold fusion here:
[2] http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2014/10/learning-from-confrontationalist.html
[3] http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/02/a-tragic-and-expensive-confusion.html

Critic of your paper

a) Obviously the paper is an half assed opus in which you have invested neither documentation nor creativity it has exactly the same logical structure and content as your former paper:
Throwback Thursday: the Foolish Fallacy of Cold fusion

b) You have now re-used your story A similar to story B, story A ended badly ergo story B will end badly too trick from the former paper now and the Kempelen Farkas
Turk chess player makes some>40% of the paper AGAIN. I considered it ab ovo irrelevant for any scam, it was a proof of a genius inventor and a genius chess player
and of the marvels of mechanics plus it had humor. A bad choice of you, belonging to both the Hungsrisn snd Romanian language based cultures, I have a very positive vision of the story well described in the Wikipedia.
I guess you are a passionate of chess, so I am too see please:

[5]MEMORIES FROM THE CHESS CLUB
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2012/04/memories-from-chess-club.html

c ) It seems you strongly dislike the idea of Cold Fusion per se, and you take it literally as fusion at low temperatures- it is more friendly to use its newer name,more realistic Low Energy Nuclear Reactions. Recently a very important study has demonstrated the existence (but not yet the usability) of LENR- 

[6] DTRA- NVESTIGATION OF NANO-NUCLEAR REACTIONS IN CONDENSED MATTER FINAL REPORT 
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/MosierBossinvestigat.pdf

It is not fair to ignore this, as well as the rich LENR classic literature star
ting e.g. with Edmund Storms' second book:

[7] THE EXPLANATION OF LOW ENERGY NUCLEAR REACTION
http://lenrexplained.com/

Or take a look to the program of the coming ICCF20- in Japan and China.
LENR exists and is alive.
However it is not prosperous nad the main point of this message is to explain you- nd not only to you the reasons for the nedemic howawever curable development problems of LENR.

THE STOPPABLE PECHVOGEL NATURE OF LENR.

The birth and early history of Cold Fusion is/are  not well understood, even and in a sense, mainly in the LENR community which is tragically fragmented, divided and recently (2011) -split. In April 2016 a local civil war has started there.

The start was as unlucky possible the broad phenomenon being discovered at a bad time, in the worst place possible, in an underdeveloped form by two geniuses having an improper profession for this great discovery- electrochemists. In the Fleischmann Pons Cell, Cold Fusion was drowned in (heavy) water and constrained to work at temperatures less than that of boiling water. The Cell has shown beyond any doubt the very existence of excess heat in amounts  greater than chemistries of all kind could explain however has worked in self-limited conditions, the phenomenon being weak, unreliable and of rather short duration. The alternatives as Piantelli's NiH were marginalized and considered as heretic. The competition of Hot Fusion and the theoretical impossibility of low temperature fusion by linearly thinking physicists have lead to the fast conversion of LENR in a pariah science; unfortunately science was unable to inspire emancipatory strong results.
The truth- PdD a la Fleischmann and Pons is not a complete, optimal form of LENR was and is not recognized. LENR has heroically survived despite its debility due t the heroic efforts and admirable creativity of its faithful experimenters. A great variety of theories  have been published but their connection to the experimental progress is -euphemistically speaking- vague.
So our Pechvogel science had a very unhappy youth being not able to solve basic problems as understanding of identity and nature, intensification, reproducibility, scale up... The Physicists have claimed that LENR belongs o them- and i dare to think this is an other unlucky factor.
Being a Pechvogel myself living in an oppressive society, having tragic family problems, fighting for survival- I could not dedicate my actiivity to experiments and when I could in principle it was too late and i too old.
But I was free to think and to tell what I think as now based on the results of my colleagues to whom I am deeply grateful.
My approach was of a technologist and a problem solver my dream is that LENR will be the energy source of the future.
So in 1992 I made a review of the existent data and have concluded that cold fusion includes a catalytic phase, takes place in active sites, and these depend on the dynamics of the surface metal  atoms  (surfdyn):

{8] UNDERSTANDING REPRODUCIBILITY: TOPOLOGY IS THE KEY
.http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/GluckPunderstand.pdf
  It was later published  in Fusion Technology, but due to my Pechvogel nature it went unnoticed.
Then in the very first issue of Infinite Energy I have concluded that due to the unexpectedness, strangeness, complexity  and extreme difficulty of Cold Fusion cannot be solved by science (read for then- physics) alone, without the direct contribution of technology

[9] “Why Te[chnology First?” 
Infinite Energy 1s tissue, March-April 1995, p 26

A blasphemous, unpopular idea - it exists a cult of the Scientific Method, no shortcuts are admitted.

OK, years have elapsed progress was incremental. Then in 20111 Rossi- an entrepreneur and inventor has arrived with his claim of enhanced excess heat. 
It was bad luck or else that no insider LENR-ist found a solution.
The rest of the story is very complex- Rossi's 1 year 1MW experiment is now denied by Industrial Heat and a trial is in full development. I am convinced that Rossi's data are valid- his long time test a success. Rossi' has opened new horizons to LENR
at higher temperatures(up to 1400C) tyhe Surfdyn effect makes excess heat from additive to multiplicative. But it is not easy!
However only the first commercial generators on the market will bring certainty and the conversion of LENR from a Pechvogel in a regular science technology with a great future..

The conclusion of the Siegel paper.

"This doesn’t necessarily mean that they’re lying, that LENR is impossible or that there’s fraud going on. But it isn’t the job of science to prove that someone is fooling us; it’s the job of a good scientist to prove to the world that we aren’t fooling ourselves when we make an extraordinary claim. As soon as that bar is cleared — and that starts with the people working on this making an extraordinary effort to demonstrate that bar is cleared — we can promote LENR or cold fusion to the realm of real, robust and incredible science. But until that day, we should all remain skeptical."

It says nothing, but it says it well.
I think and hope, somewhere in the near future a dialog with Ethan will be possible-
if he wants to take real responsibility for his statements about LENR.


DAILY NEWS

1) The Energy 2.0 Society/ LENR 101
Date:September 23, 2016
Source:Cornell University
Summary:
Multiferroics -- materials that exhibit both magnetic and electric order -- are of interest for next-generation computing but difficult to create because the conditions conducive to each of those states are usually mutually exclusive. And in most multiferroics found to date, their respective properties emerge only at extremely low temperatures. Now researchers have combined two non-multiferroic materials, using the best attributes of both to create a new room-temperature multiferroic.
Closing in on high-temperature superconductivity

Saturday, September 24, 2016

SEP 24, 2016 LENR ORWELL' S STYLE

MOTTO

1-Political language... is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind. (George Orwell)


2- He who controls the past controls the future. He who controls the present controls the past. (George Orwell)

3- The very concept of objective truth is fading out of the world. Lies will pass into history. (George Orwell)

4- If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear. (George Orwell)

5- War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength. George Orwell

6- But if thought corrupts language, language can also corrupt thought. 
 (George Orwell)

7- Power is in tearing human minds to pieces and putting them together again in new shapes of your own choosing.”(George Orwell)

8- Big Brother is Watching You. (George Orwell)  




DAILY NOTES

I really hate contributing to the popularity of the IH propagandists. Actually they lack both effectiveness and efficiency, they are more annoying than dangerous. Some people still takes them seriously so I will write about them- avoiding adjectives as much as possible because I will not descend to their level. The problem is that they are trying to play Big Brother. to my dislike.

I know too well their methods, mode of thinking, mentality because I have lived  many years in an Orwellian society. I have read '1984' and lived it.

First please (re)read my classic:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2012/09/the-principle-of-chief-engineer.html
You must do the impossible if the Boss says it! You must believe the impossible is it is in the favor of our boss!

An other Orwellian story I lived was 
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/05/may-15-2016-sunday-issue-about-lenr.html 
see please about my communist kangaroo court and the instructive story of the florentine vessel

One unforgettable meeting with a communist Party activist; we started to manufacture plasticizers for PVC- they are made by esterification of an organic biacid (actually used phtalic anhydride) with increasingly heavy (more C atoms) alcohols. The most important alcohol, C8- 2-ethyl-hexyl was then very expensive
and the Party activist has instructed us to reduce the specific consume- you must do it use less with 25% each year! You (me, the technologist) will be responsible, have you understood tovarishch engineer?
I told him calmly that this is fine just impossible, it is about a chemical reaction
that follows the laws of Nature!
He got simply mad and has explained shouting and with a vocabulary that would make even my opponents of today to blush. that the decisions, directives of the Party have priority over everything- stupid laws of Nature, burzhui chemistry, perverse logic, coward thinking- so I should shut up and do my duty, otherwise... allusions to the my "class enemy" character and past. (my parents were not poor)

With amazement and an easy taste of horror I observe the same oppressive thinking at the propagandists of IH in the Rossi vs. Darden conflict- in the frame of an Internet campaign aiming to help the legal issue. No, I am a not exaggerating a bit; Jed snd Abd's fans should be listen carefully to what I will tell.

Please keep the 7 Mottoes- Orwell quotes in mind.

The most recent discussion can be found here:
https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/index.php/Thread/3811-Rossi-vs-IH-Update-Sep-9-20%E2%80%93-James-A-Bass-now-a-Third-Party-in-IH%E2%80%99s-Counter-Comp/?pageNo=5

To take it shortly I had a dispute with Jed Rothwell re three main proofs of IH for their scenario of the Test- no het, scam, conspiracy, evil Rossi etc.

The first dispute now in the stage of total madness is about the flowmeter.
Jed has told officially he has seen the schematics of the Plant. Therefore I have asked him:

_ Where was the flowmeter in the diagram of the Plant?  Answer

I told you already! Time after time I told you. You never listen. It is in liquid water, which means it has to be between the condenser and the reservoir. Where else could it be?
Continues
You don't need me to tell you this. You could have figured it out yourself, from the flow meter specifications. That meter will not work in steam. So if there really is steam between the reactor and condenser (repeat) 

OK, this is orwellian elimination of logic and blatant illiteracy in matter of (chemicaL) engineering. The flowmeter CAN NOT BE THERE  and was not
a) becaus e it does not work in that place, the flowmeter with moving parts needs a minimum of 3 barr pressure, or a column of 30 meters height to work. This is the reason for which it is where it is, between the pump and the ECats; 

b) It has absolutely no reason to be where Jed said it was,- suppose it measures the flow of warm water returning from the customer to the reservoir, but in the same time water from that reservoir is sent by the pump to be converted in steam, so the measured flow is not relevant- but also not measurable with this type of instrument.

I have Jed to send me the diagram  with the flowmeter in that absurd place:
The answer was:

You would not believe it even if I sent you the diagram. You would say I drew the diagram myself, and it did not come from Rossi. You will believe what you want to believe, no matter what I say. You will believe whatever Rossi tells you, no matter how impossible it may be.

Cheap trick but he surely has no authentic diagram- but he can perfectly anticioate what I will do! The same newspeak as with the ERV Report he received from Rossi by error but a strict NDA obliges him to hide the document - any half brained could see it shows no excess energy (but IH has not seen it), A cobweb of fantasies- lies can have creative value but these fuzzy things no.


Jed also tells about the warehouse having no ventilation. Why not? Any normal warehouse has ventilating but this one was made to prove no energy there? 
The photos of the JM space are not taken from inside and not the complete roof can be seen so it cannot say if it was or was not ventilation. It is no proof.

Jed is surprisingly misinformed- in many respects, has no idea about the JM space and energy consuming method activity but as a good Orwellian character all his wishes and guesses and imaginations are certainties. The director of JM, Jim Bass was a ghost now it is real but Jed knows better. He changes the past and creates new realities.

Enough for today but I will continue- I bet Jed and later Abd will not like  and will deny being orwellian oppressors.

Going to watch a bit TV- the Gastro-Angel at Duna TV
DAILY NEWS


1) ICCF20 Poster Presentations

1-Orchideh Azizi SKINR, Univ. Missouri, USA
Effect of mercury on the kinetics and mechanism of hydrogen/ deuterium loading into palladium in alkaline solution

 2- Francesco Celani INFN-LNF, Italy
The Zitterbewegung interpretation of quantum mechanics as theoretical framework for Ultra Dense Deuterium and Low Energy Nuclear Reactions

3- William Collis ISCMNS, Italy
Minimal Exotic Neutral Particle Models

4)-Volodymyr Dubinko NSC KIPT, Ukraine
Radiation-induced formation of localized anharmonic vibrations as a method to trigger LENR A

 5- George Egely Egely Ltd., Hungary
Influencing Radioactivity via Transmutation A

6-  Arik El-Boher SKINR, Univ. Missouri,
USA Final report on SKINR replication experimental program to seek excess heat using Ni powders mixed with LiAlH4 and free Li under high temperature Hydrogen gas

7- Max Fomitchev-Zamilov Quantum Potential Corporation, USA Neutron Synthesis via Arc Discharge in Low-Pressure Hydrogen Plasma: Successful Replication of Earnest Sternglass Experiment

8- I.V.Goryachev Russian Academy of Sciences, Russia Implementing Innovative Technologies for Cleaning Sea Areas from Solid Pollution

9- Robert Greenyer Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project, United Kingdom Live Open Science, experience in LENR research and techniques for future application to advance the scientific method

10- P. L. Hagelstein Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA Statistical mechanics models for PdHx and PdDx

12- Philippe Hatt Independent, Belgium
Cold Nuclear Transmutations Theoretical models of atom nuclei

13- Philippe Hatt Independent, Belgium
Cold Nuclear Transmutations Structural Anomaly of Palladium Nucleus

 14-  T. Itoh Tohoku University, Japan
Pd, Se, Zr Transmutation Experiments induced by D2 gas permeation with the nano-sized Pd complexes

14Lutz Jaitner www.condensedplasmoids.com, Germany
Condensed Plasmoids – The Intermediate State of LENR

15- Andrew Meulenberg Science for Humanity Trust, Inc., USA
Physical reasons for rejecting arguments against Deep-Dirac Levels - Physical reality vs mathematical models in LENR

 16-Melvin H. Miles University of LaVerne, USA
The Eyring Rate Theory Applied To Cold Fusion

17- Hidemi Miura Independent, Japan
States of Hydrogen, Oxygen or Magnesium Atom in or with Cubic Ice Crystal-like Water Clusters

18- David J. Nagel The George Washington University, USA
Gas-Phase Nickel Hydrogen Experiments in Nickel Tubes in a Furnace

19- David J. Nagel The George Washington University, USA
Electrical Noise Spectroscopy of LENR Electrochemical Cells

20- David J. Nagel The George Washington University, USA
Production of Clean Water by using Energy from LENR

21- Ken Naitoh Waseda University, Japan

A new physical theory for describing and stabilizing cold fusion

NOTE- for me of special interest No.6 and 18.

2) LENR 101 Part 1 Origins of Cold Fusion https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KFYiFz4A54Y

3) LENR 101 Part 2 – The Rossi Effect https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mkk0saQz9m4

4) LENR 101 Part 4 Questions and Answers

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=13WG_0V6ia4

5) LENR Test Kit, MK .1 Model T : What's In The Box & Assembly :Part https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yF5dHdjaO3E&feature=youtu.be


 (-) Ethan Siegel's famous paper- on its regular place- Science Blogs
http://scienceblogs.com/startswithabang/2016/09/23/is-cold-fusion-feasible-or-is-it-a-fraud-synopsis/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+ScienceblogsPhysicalScience+%28ScienceBlogs+Channel+%3A+Physical+Science%29

6) A German language Forum;
LENR- niederenergetische Reaktionen
https://www.allmystery.de/themen/gw72294-6

LENR IN CONTEXT-1


X-ray laser glimpses how electrons dance with atomic nuclei in materials\

Date:September 22, 2016
Source:SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory
Summary:
The coupling between electrons and phonons determines how efficiently solar cells convert sunlight into electricity. It also plays key roles in superconductors that transfer electricity without losses, topological insulators that conduct electricity only on their surfaces, materials that drastically change their electrical resistance when exposed to a magnetic field, and more.

Combining the elements palladium, ruthenium for industry
Date:September 21, 2016
Source:National Institute for Materials Science
Summary:
For a long time, researchers have thought that combining palladium and ruthenium could lead to improved and novel properties for industrial applications. However, the two elements do not readily mix together to become a single material.

LENR IN CONTEXT-2

Science has next to nothing to say about moral intuitions